In the news
5 June 2020 – a day to remember Lecretia Seales
Lecretia Seales went to the High Court in 2015 to seek a ruling that would allow a doctor to assist her to die with her consent. Russell McVeagh were honored to have represented her in those proceedings which now stand as an important chapter in New Zealand's legal history. For those of us who were involved, it was one of our proudest but saddest times as lawyers at the firm.
5 June 2020 marks the five year anniversary of Lecretia's death, which came shortly after the decision in her case. Lecretia was an intensely private person but took these proceedings because of her strong belief that change was required for people like her that faced the prospect of unbearable suffering at the end of life as a result of terminal illness. She was clear she did not want to die, that choice had been taken from her by aggressive brain cancer, but she wanted to have the choice of a good death. Lecretia was committed to law reform as a means of ensuring our legal framework reflected the expectations and needs of society. She hoped that, should her proceedings not succeed, the process would instigate debate and a law reform process. And it did - her court case initiated a national debate, helped focus a parliamentary inquiry into assisted dying and ultimately led to the introduction and passing of the End of Life Choice Act which goes to a referendum at the upcoming election. Lecretia would be chuffed and pleased to know that she provides ongoing inspiration to many, including young lawyers and future law reformers.
Public consultation opens on Auckland Council's Emergency Budget
On 29 May 2020, Auckland Council agreed to adopt the Consultation Document for its Emergency Budget 2020/2021, with public feedback open until 19 June 2020.
The Emergency Budget responds to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Auckland Council's finances. The Council estimates that in the coming financial year, operating cash income will be around $525 million less than what was initially budgeted. Mayor Phil Goff said "The hit to Auckland Council's revenues by COVID-19 is more than half a billion dollars – the highest faced by any council, and the highest in the city's history".
The proposed Emergency Budget reduces spending and defers certain infrastructure projects. However, the Council has "…sought to keep as much investment as possible in building the infrastructure the city needs to improve transport, the environment and for housing" said Mayor Phil Goff.
The key question considered in the consultation is whether Auckland Council should increase average general rates by 3.5% (as previously agreed), or whether a smaller increase of 2.5% should be adopted. The latter option would mean further cuts in spending, including $50 million less in community assets and in transport projects to improve road safety.
Additional proposals in the Emergency Budget include a COVID-19 rates postponement scheme, which allows ratepayers that are financially strained as a result of COVID-19 to defer their rate payments for the 2020/2021 year (up to $20,000), as well as a suspension of the Accommodation Provider Targeted Rate.
Auckland Council expects to make emergency budget decisions by 16 July 2020, and formally adopt the budget on 30 July 2020.
The Emergency Budget 2020/2021 consultation document is available here.
Review of CAA organisational culture released
On 21 May 2020, Transport Minister Phil Twyford released the Ministry of Transport's Independent Review into the Organisational Culture of the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) (available here). Minister Twyford commissioned the Review in the wake of mounting concerns about the culture of the CAA – in particular, the inappropriate handling of bullying and harassments complaints.
The Ministry of Transport led the Review, and appointed barrister Rachael Schmidt-McCleave and the RDC Group to provide independent support. The Terms of Reference for the Review are available here. The Review focused on three key areas:
- conducting a workplace culture assessment;
- considering how complaints of bullying and harassment had been handled; and
- ensuring there are policies and procedures to promote staff wellbeing and a culture of 'speaking out'.
The overall finding of the Review is that the culture (both past and present) of the CAA does not operate to support a safe and respectful workplace, and in certain areas, it is below the minimum standards required for health, safety and wellbeing. At its core, the Review found that inappropriate behaviours were able to occur because of the inability of leadership to understand how to build an appropriate culture, including an inability to adequately identify and address issues such as bullying and sexual harassment.
The Review made a number of recommendations in the areas of leadership and management (including reporting), keeping staff engaged and safe (including health and wellbeing), as well as policies, procedures and guidelines. The CAA Board has accepted the Review's findings and is committed to adopting all recommendations (see here).
Minister Twyford stated that, "A healthy culture is vital if the Authority is to keep kiwis safe in the skies and help reshape our aviation sector for the post-pandemic world". His press release can be found here.
Proposed amendments to the NZBORA
The New Zealand Bill of Rights (Declarations of Inconsistency) Amendment Bill (Bill) passed through its first reading on 27 May 2020, and was referred to the Privileges Committee. The Bill is designed to strengthen the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act (NZBORA) by requiring Parliament to take action if a court says a statute undermines the rights enshrined in the NZBORA.
Presently, if a court issues a declaration of inconsistency with the NZBORA, the declaration will not affect the validity of the Act. It is simply a signal that the court considers an Act to infringe fundamental human rights in a way that cannot be justified in a free and democratic society. There is no legal mechanism to hold Parliament to account. Under the Bill, if a senior court makes a declaration of inconsistency with the NZBORA, the Attorney-General will be required to draw this declaration to the attention of the House of Representatives within six sitting days of the declaration becoming final. Parliament will then have the opportunity to consider whether it wishes to repeal, amend, or affirm the provision in question.
The process the Bill envisages is similar to the requirement in section 7 of the NZBORA, in which the Attorney-General must bring to Parliament's attention any inconsistencies between proposed legislation and the provisions of the NZBORA. Standing Orders then require these inconsistencies to be referred to select committee for consideration. The Bill would implement a similar automatic process when senior courts make such a declaration.
The Human Rights Act 1993 will also be amended so the response to a declaration of inconsistency by the Human Rights Review Tribunal is the same as the response to a declaration under the NZBORA.
Remuneration reduction for top public officials
On 15 April 2020, Cabinet agreed that all Government ministers would take a 20% pay cut. This required amendments to the Remuneration Authority Act 1977 (Act), to allow the Authority to make a temporary determination for certain public officials to take a reduction in pay of up to 20% for six months. The Government's FAQs assert that the amendment legislation is not about austerity and savings, but about leaders in the public sector demonstrating pay restraint at a time when many New Zealanders in the private sector are losing their jobs or facing pay cuts.
This was enabled by the Remuneration Authority (COVID-19 measures) Amendment Act, which came into force on 16 May 2020, amending the original Act by inserting section 19A. Temporary reductions can only be made to remuneration payable to officer holders listed in schedule 4A of the Remuneration Authority Act 1977. This includes MPs, elected members of local government and other high-ranking public officials.
The explanatory note to the Bill stated that its purpose was to allow public sector leaders during the COVID-19 outbreak to show leadership in the public sector and solidarity with the private sector.
No temporary reduction determination can be made after 30 June 2020 and any reduction made must expire no later than six months after it comes into force. The maximum reduction is also limited to no more than 20% of a person's remuneration. A temporary reduction is yet to be publicly confirmed. The press release, including a link to the FAQs, is available here.
Once in a generation budget
On 14 May 2020, the Minister of Finance, Hon Grant Robertson, unveiled the 2020 "wellbeing" budget ("Budget"), which establishes $50 billion of additional spending for the Government's response to COVID-19.
This $50 billion is in addition to the $12.1 billion already spent on the initial COVID-19 Economic Response Package announced on 17 March 2020, meaning the Government has made available funding of up to $62.1 billion in the COVID-19 response and recovery. However, only $15.9 billion is being immediately allocated in the Budget to spending programmes, leaving $20.2 billion to be put aside for future investment. Minister Robertson stated in his Budget speech, "this is the most significant financial commitment by a New Zealand government in modern history. The fund does not represent a target for spending, but gives us the flexibility to be able to respond as necessary."
The Treasury has acknowledged the high level of uncertainty that presented significant challenges when forecasting its economic, tax and fiscal outlook. Some of the assumptions that underlined its economic forecasts (which were finalised on 17 April 2020) are already outdated, such as Alert Level 3 restrictions being in place for a month. As Minister Robertson pointed out, "economic forecasting is more of an art than a science at the best of times, but more so than ever now."
That said, the Treasury has forecast unemployment to peak at 9.8% in September 2020 and recover thereafter. With that in mind, the Budget has a heavy focus on the workforce and supporting employment and to that end it allocates:
- $3.2 billion for an eight-week extension of the wage subsidy scheme (albeit with a more restricted eligibility criteria);
- $3 billion boost to infrastructure spending expected to stimulate the sector and create jobs;
- $1.6 billion for trades and apprenticeships training; and
- $1.1 billion for jobs in environmental projects.
While almost unanimously accepted that the economy is in need of a massive stimulus, concerns have been raised over the debt blowout and the Government's ability to finance it going forward. Net core Crown debt is forecast by the Treasury to rise from around 20% currently to a peak of 53.3% of GDP by the 2023 fiscal year. Adding to the concerns is the fact that, with the Official Cash Rate at record low levels, the Reserve Bank is not in a strong position to provide further stimulus through its monetary policy.
More information on the Budget can be found on the Treasury's website here.
Reset of the Provincial Growth Fund
Minister for Regional Economic Development, Hon Shane Jones, recently announced that the Government has repurposed funds from the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) and the Regional Investment Opportunities Contingency to support regional growth in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The refocused PGF has three objectives that drive decision-making – the creation of jobs, reduction in delivery timelines, and promoting visibility in the regions.
The Government announced the first of the new projects to be funded, specifically:
- $100 million for waterway fencing, riparian planting and stock water reticulation to incentivise farmers to fence off sensitive waterways from stock;
- $60 million for local road and rail investments; and
- $70 million for upgrades of marae, town halls, Pasifika churches and war memorials in order to provide work for local tradesmen while regular building works and repair is on hold.
The press release also announced a further $7.5 million of PGF-funding for another four projects:
- $2.9 million to Apollo Foods Ltd for new technology and to upskill workers to increase productivity and capability;
- $2.5 million for an upgrade to Raglan Wharf to increase berth numbers and improve access for commercial operators, recreational users, and visiting customers;
- $1.86 million to redevelop the Westport waterfront, including the addition of a pedestrian bridge to allow trail-related businesses closer access to the town centre; and
- $209,500 for Te Pari Products to buy equipment that will increase its capacity to supply the primary sector with livestock-handling equipment.
The Minister's press release is available here.
Report on the gun buyback scheme
The Office of the Auditor General has completed its report of the firearms buyback and amnesty scheme. The scheme was implemented in response to the Christchurch terror attack that took the lives of 51 worshippers and injured around 45 others. In September 2019, the Auditor-General announced it would report back to Parliament after it had examined how well the scheme was implemented, given the significant public interest.
It is unknown how many prohibited firearms existed before the buyback. Police estimates, scrutinised by NZ Institute of Economic Research (NZIER), suggested it could range between 55,000 and 240,000 firearms. As at February 2020, 61,332 prohibited firearms had been collected and destroyed, or modified by police-approved gunsmiths to comply with the new requirements. In addition to the assault rifles and military-style semi-automatic firearms that were destroyed under the buyback scheme, Police have seized more than 2,400 unlawful firearms from gangs and other offenders since March 2019. Compensation of $102 million was paid to gun owners, with the final cost forecast to be $120 million. The cost to administer the scheme, initially estimated at $18 million, was greater than anticipated, growing to $35 million.
The report found that the buyback scheme was complex, challenging, and high risk – particularly given deficiencies in how information had previously been recorded for military style semi-automatics, or E-category firearms. Police are said to have managed the scheme effectively and communicated well with the public. The scheme was supported by good systems and processes, with a robust level of oversight and that compensation payments did not exceed what was appropriate.
However, the report noted that ongoing work is needed to ensure that prohibited weapons are kept out of the wrong hands and firearms ownership is restricted to responsible licensed people. The report recommends Police continue to build relationships with firearms owners and dealers, improve the information they use to keep on top of gun regulations, and create a framework to show how the new regulations have made New Zealand safer.
Update on the Christchurch Call
On 15 May 2019, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and French President, Emmanuel Macron brought together Heads of State and Government and leaders from the tech centre to adopt the Christchurch Call. The Christchurch Call (Call) is a pledge that seeks to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online to stop the internet being used as a tool for terrorists.
The Government has provided its update one year on from the commitment:
- The Call has the support of 48 countries, the European Commission, two international organisations, and eight tech companies.
- An Advisory Network of civil society members is designed to ensure ongoing work strikes the right balance between protecting out populations from online harm, while still guarding the freedom of expression, and our belief in a free, open, and secure internet.
- There is now the means to coordinate across governments and tech companies to respond to attempts to use the internet as a terrorist weapon.
- Tech companies have reformed the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism into an independent organisation, with a 24/7 crisis management function, an enhanced governance structure, and an Independent Advisory Committee, scheduled for launch in mid-2020.
- A crisis response protocol has been adopted and was used in October 2019 and February 2020.
In delivering the update, the Prime Minister noted that if a similar attack occurred again, the international network of governments and tech companies is "ready to mobilise and work against the forces that boosted the viral spread of content from Christchurch". The Prime Minister and President Macron also released a joint statement reaffirming their commitment to the Call.
Press releases are available here and here, and a link to the website dedicated to the Call can be viewed here.
Drought Recovery Fund
The Government has announced a new fund intended to help the primary sector prepare their businesses to recover from droughts. The fund will be managed by the Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI). The $500,000 fund will provide advisory services (of up to $5,000 excl. GST per applicant) to equip rural businesses with technical and professional advice. The types of advisory services available will include strategic planning and development of farm business plans, practical advice on land management and sustainable management techniques, and technical advice on soil and pastures.
Applicants must meet three criteria to be eligible for the fund:
- The farm must be located in a relevant drought affected area, being anywhere in the North Island, Chatham Islands, or the top of the South Island.
- The farming business must have been negatively affected by the 2020 drought.
- At least 50% of the farmer's income, in a normal year, must be earned from the farming business.
In announcing the fund, Hon Damien O'Connor highlighted one of the unusual consequences of the drought that has already started to be noticed by consumers – that being the paler colour of our butter.
Applications must be made by 12 June 2020, and successful applicants will be informed by 22 June 2020. Farmers will be able to choose a supplier from a pre-approved list prepared by MPI. The new fund is in addition to $17 million invested by the Government to help drought stricken regions recover from the current drought.
More information is available on MPI's webpage here.
Changes to tobacco legislation
In mid-May, Parliament passed the Customs and Excise (Tobacco) Amendment Act 2020, which tightens border controls for the purposes of reducing revenue evasion, increases Customs' visibility on imports and closes off import channels used by smugglers.
Loopholes in the earlier law presented difficulties for Customs when dealing with illicit cigarette and loose leaf tobacco consignments imported for sale on the black market. Since 2015, Customs has seen a 352% increase in interceptions of smuggled cigarettes, with the unpaid excise tax on seized illicit tobacco products being almost $11 million in 2019 alone. In such cases, Customs was required to prove that the importation of tobacco sent via international mail and freight was for the purpose of evading excise tax.
Under the new law, from 1 July 2020, persons importing tobacco products will require a permit from the New Zealand Customs Service. The new permit system will help Customs deal with cases of smuggling faster, by enabling it to take action where permits have not been obtained.
The law was debated under urgency, which drew some criticism on the basis that the Bill does not play a role in the COVID-19 recovery or create jobs for the hard-hit New Zealand economy. Minister of Customs Hon Jenny Salesa identified the involvement of organised crime, money laundering, and the circumvention of smoke-free controls as factors that justified urgency.
The new law will not affect duty free allowances for travellers, which will continue to be subject to existing rules.
The Minister's press release is available here.